best Stamford onlyfans accounts

Stamford Onlyfans Accounts Worth Subbing [ALWAYS UPDATED]

Bradley

If you're trying to find quality Stamford accounts without scrolling through endless profiles, this overview gives you the Top 43 best Stamford Onlyfans influencers in one place. The table lets you compare subscription pricing, posting frequency, and content style side by side so you can match what each creator offers to your own preferences. I chose these profiles using verified status, steady activity levels, and clear privacy practices as the main filters. The entry at number one separates itself through reliable delivery and straightforward communication with subscribers.

1. angelina_jones – Test Winner

angelina_jones OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

The list opens with angelina_jones because the profile feels the most put-together among the early entries, even with minimal visible activity.

  • Best for: People who want a clean starting point without paying upfront
  • Main appeal: Simple, no-frills presentation that leaves room to explore
  • Content feel: Still quiet but easy to scan quickly
  • Small drawback: Very little posted yet, so early subscribers are mostly betting on future updates

First impression

The page looks neat and direct, with none of the clutter that sometimes appears on newer accounts. It gives a calm first signal rather than trying to impress immediately.

Who they are best for

Anyone testing the Stamford niche who prefers to begin with a free profile before committing time or money elsewhere.

Subscription value

Free to join, though the current posting level is low. Good entry point if you like to watch a creator grow rather than dive into an already busy feed.

My verdict: The clearest early choice on the list because everything else feels either busier or more scattered. Rating: 9.4/10


2. Luna – Quiet but Steady

Luna OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Luna sits just behind the top spot because the account shows a bit more material than the first entry while keeping the same free access.

  • Best for: Viewers who want a small selection of photos and videos without paying
  • Main appeal: Modest but visible library already in place
  • Content feel: Low-key and unhurried
  • Small drawback: Still early days, so variety remains limited

First impression

The profile gives a relaxed impression. Nothing flashy, just a steady handful of images and clips that look thoughtfully chosen rather than rushed.

Who they are best for

Subscribers who like to browse a quiet feed and check back occasionally rather than scroll through daily posts.

Subscription value

Free account with 54 photos and 11 videos already visible. Enough to sample without pressure, though growth will determine long-term interest.

My verdict: A sensible second step after angelina_jones if you want slightly more to look at right away. Rating: 9.2/10


3. Karina🍭 – Most Visible Free Option

Karina🍭 OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Karina stands out among the free profiles because the like count and photo total are noticeably higher than the entries above.

  • Best for: Fans who want more free content without jumping to a paid page yet
  • Main appeal: Clear volume of posts already available
  • Content feel: Light and approachable
  • Small drawback: The style leans mainstream, so it may not match every Stamford preference

First impression

The numbers tell the story here. More photos and a visible audience make the profile feel more established than the quieter pages above it.

Who they are best for

People who like to explore a larger free library before deciding whether they want something more specific.

Subscription value

Free access with 273 photos and 10 videos showing. Solid place to spend time without cost, provided the tone fits what you are after.

My verdict: The strongest free account so far in terms of actual content volume. Rating: 9.1/10


4. Skylarmaexo – Best Premium Feed

Skylarmaexo OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Skylarmaexo is the first paid entry and the one with the largest visible output by far.

  • Best for: Subscribers ready to pay for a very active, well-stocked profile
  • Main appeal: Thousands of photos plus hundreds of videos
  • Content feel: Polished and high-volume
  • Small drawback: $30 monthly price is the highest here, so it is a real commitment

First impression

Everything about the page signals scale. The numbers are in a different league from the free accounts, and the presentation looks built to support regular visitors.

Who they are best for

Anyone who wants frequent updates and a large archive and is willing to pay for it.

Subscription value

$30 per month for 4k photos and 550 videos. The price is clear and the amount of material is unmatched on this list.

My verdict: The obvious paid upgrade if volume and consistency matter most. Rating: 9.0/10


5. niki – Best Casual Free Library

niki OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Niki offers another free option with a healthy mix of photos and videos that feels less corporate than the paid page above.

  • Best for: Users who enjoy a relaxed free feed with decent variety
  • Main appeal: Nearly a thousand photos and a useful number of videos
  • Content feel: Friendly and low-pressure
  • Small drawback: Lacks the premium polish of the paid account

First impression

The profile sits comfortably between the quieter free pages and the big paid one. The numbers are respectable and the tone feels personal rather than overly produced.

Who they are best for

Subscribers who want regular free content without the intensity of a full paid subscription.

Subscription value

Free with 975 photos and 140 videos already posted. A strong middle-ground choice if you like browsing without paying.

My verdict: The best free middle option if you want more than the top three but still prefer zero cost. Rating: 9.0/10


6. BettyπŸ¦‹ – Most Minimal Free Profile

BettyπŸ¦‹ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Betty closes the first six with the smallest visible library among them, which places it lower but still worth noting for completeness.

  • Best for: Curious viewers who want to check one more free account quickly
  • Main appeal: Simple and straightforward presentation
  • Content feel: Very light and early-stage
  • Small drawback: Limited photos and videos compared with the rest of the group

First impression

The page looks basic. There is enough to see the creator’s general direction, but not enough yet to judge long-term consistency.

Who they are best for

People who like to scan every free profile in a niche before focusing on the stronger ones.

Subscription value

Free with 94 photos and 4 videos showing. Useful only if the style matches exactly, otherwise the earlier free options offer more.

My verdict: A minor early entry that feels more like a placeholder than a destination. Rating: 8.7/10


7. Nadya🧸 – Lightest Free Presence

Nadya🧸 OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Nadya appears lower on the list simply because the visible output is thinner than the accounts ranked above it. The profile still exists and is free, but it does not offer much to explore yet.

  • Best for: Users who want to glance at every free option without spending time
  • Main appeal: Simple free access with almost no barrier
  • Content feel: Extremely minimal and early
  • Small drawback: Only 35 photos and 4 videos, so most visitors will move on quickly

First impression

The page looks unfinished. The pictures are there, but the overall layout does not suggest an account that has been actively developed or maintained for long.

Who they are best for

Anyone who prefers to check every free profile in order before deciding where to focus attention.

Subscription value

Free to view, yet the small library means little time is actually spent here compared with the stronger free accounts earlier in the ranking.

My verdict: A quiet entry that mostly serves as a reminder that not every free page has the same level of activity. Rating: 8.4/10


8. Maya🧚 – Smallest Visible Library

Maya🧚 OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Maya sits here because the account shows the fewest posts of any profile reviewed so far. It is technically free and open, but the content simply is not there in noticeable quantity.

  • Best for: Curious browsers who want to cover every single free listing
  • Main appeal: Zero cost and almost zero commitment
  • Content feel: Barely started
  • Small drawback: Only 13 photos and no videos, leaving almost nothing to judge

First impression

The profile feels like a placeholder. There is an image and a name, but the page does not give any real sense of style or direction yet.

Who they are best for

People who like to scan the entire list before narrowing their options and do not mind empty-feeling accounts.

Subscription value

Free, though the lack of material makes it hard to see any lasting value until more content appears.

My verdict: The weakest free profile in the upper half of the ranking simply due to how little is present. Rating: 8.1/10


9. SinisterMisa – Paid Account with Modest Output

SinisterMisa OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

SinisterMisa is the second paid creator on the list and brings a slightly darker visual tone compared with the bright, light profiles that came before.

  • Best for: Subscribers who prefer a paid page but do not need thousands of posts
  • Main appeal: Clear paid structure with some existing content
  • Content feel: Focused and intentional rather than mass-produced
  • Small drawback: $14.99 monthly fee for only 324 photos and 24 videos feels steep next to the bigger paid option

First impression

The page carries a more deliberate mood. The photos feel chosen with care, and the pricing is clearly visible, yet the total volume stays modest.

Who they are best for

Viewers willing to pay a mid-range fee for a smaller, more curated selection instead of a huge archive.

Subscription value

$14.99 per month for a paid experience that sits between the large free libraries and the very big paid feed ranked fourth.

My verdict: A reasonable paid step for anyone who has already looked at the free options and wants something more focused. Rating: 8.6/10


10. Little Lian – Free Profile with Noticeable Likes

Little Lian OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Little Lian earns its spot through a high like count despite a relatively small number of posts. The ratio suggests the existing photos have been well received.

  • Best for: Users who judge quality by audience response rather than raw volume
  • Main appeal: Strong engagement signals with only 46 photos
  • Content feel: Compact and apparently well liked
  • Small drawback: No videos, so the profile stays photo-only

First impression

The like total stands out immediately. The page does not flood visitors with material, yet the numbers indicate real interest in what is already there.

Who they are best for

People who want to see a free account that has already connected with a sizable audience without requiring daily uploads.

Subscription value

Free with a respectable like count on a limited set of photos. Worth a quick look if you prefer quality signals over quantity.

My verdict: A compact free option that stands out mainly because of the engagement it has already gathered. Rating: 8.5/10


11. πŸŒΈπŸŒ™ ❃ Kamila Nazir ❃ πŸŒ™πŸŒΈ – Very Early Free Account

πŸŒΈπŸŒ™ ❃ Kamila Nazir ❃ πŸŒ™πŸŒΈ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Kamila Nazir lands in this position because the page contains only 23 photos and almost no other signals of activity or audience size.

  • Best for: Visitors who want to scan every free listing in one pass
  • Main appeal: Completely free with no paywall to consider
  • Content feel: Sparse and undeveloped
  • Small drawback: Minimal content makes it hard to form any lasting impression

First impression

The layout feels tentative. There is enough to confirm the creator exists, but not enough to understand style or consistency.

Who they are best for

Anyone who likes to see the complete free landscape before choosing where to spend more time.

Subscription value

Free, though the small size means it will not hold attention for long compared with earlier free profiles.

My verdict: A thin entry that mainly exists to round out the free section of the list. Rating: 8.3/10


12. Baby Bonnie πŸŽ€πŸŽ€ – Minimal Free Page

Baby Bonnie πŸŽ€πŸŽ€ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Baby Bonnie follows the same pattern as the previous entry, offering a free account with very few posts and limited visible activity.

  • Best for: Quick scans of the entire free tier
  • Main appeal: No cost and easy to skip
  • Content feel: Barely filled out
  • Small drawback: Only 10 photos and nothing else to explore

First impression

The page presents as unfinished. There is a name and a couple of images, but the overall picture remains unclear.

Who they are best for

Readers who want to be thorough and check every free profile before moving on.

Subscription value

Free, yet the lack of material limits any real value until more content is added.

My verdict: Another early-stage free account that adds little beyond completeness. Rating: 8.2/10


13. Ellie🩰 – Least Developed Free Profile

Ellie🩰 OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Ellie closes this batch with the smallest visible set of any creator reviewed. The account is free but currently contains almost nothing to evaluate.

  • Best for: Viewers finishing a full sweep of free listings
  • Main appeal: Zero price and no expectations
  • Content feel: Extremely light
  • Small drawback: Only three photos and no videos, making comparison difficult

First impression

The page is essentially empty. It confirms existence more than it presents any real content or direction.

Who they are best for

Anyone determined to look at every free entry before focusing on the stronger profiles higher in the ranking.

Subscription value

Free, though the minimal material offers almost no reason to return regularly.

My verdict: The least substantial entry in the group and mainly notable for how little is present. Rating: 8.0/10


16. 𝐏𝐨𝐒𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐯𝐲 πŸ–€πŸˆβ€β¬› – Darker Visual Tone

𝐏𝐨𝐒𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐯𝐲 πŸ–€πŸˆβ€β¬› OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Poison Ivy steps into the mid-list with a noticeably moodier aesthetic than the brighter free accounts ahead of it.

  • Best for: Viewers who prefer a slightly edgier free profile
  • Main appeal: 199 photos with a consistent visual direction
  • Content feel: Deliberate and themed rather than random
  • Small drawback: Only four videos, so the focus stays almost entirely on photos

First impression

The page feels more curated than casual. The black-and-cat theme is clear from the start and gives the account a distinct identity among the free listings.

Who they are best for

Subscribers who like a free account with a clear stylistic choice rather than scattered or purely mainstream posts.

Subscription value

Free access with 199 photos and 4 videos. The volume is decent for a free page, though the video side stays thin.

My verdict: A mid-tier free option that earns its place mainly through its cohesive visual approach. Rating: 8.6/10


17. NikaπŸ„ – Modest but Active Free Feed

NikaπŸ„ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Nika sits comfortably in the middle of the pack with a steady, low-key free account that has more posts than several earlier entries.

  • Best for: People looking for a quiet but regularly updated free page
  • Main appeal: 92 photos and 4 videos already available
  • Content feel: Unassuming and straightforward
  • Small drawback: The smaller like count suggests limited wider attention so far

First impression

Nothing flashy here. The profile gives the impression of someone posting steadily without trying to stand out dramatically from the crowd.

Who they are best for

Viewers who want a reliable free option they can check occasionally without expecting polished production values.

Subscription value

Free with a modest but usable library. It offers more material than many of the smaller free pages higher in the ranking.

My verdict: A sensible mid-list free choice for anyone who values consistency over flash. Rating: 8.5/10


18. BettyπŸ¦‹ – Familiar Free Format

BettyπŸ¦‹ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

This second Betty account repeats the same numbers as the earlier one, which makes it feel more like a duplicate entry than a fresh option.

  • Best for: Readers scanning every free profile in the list
  • Main appeal: Zero cost with the same stats as the first Betty
  • Content feel: Basic and unchanged from the earlier listing
  • Small drawback: Offers nothing new compared with the account ranked sixth

First impression

The page looks identical in content volume to the previous Betty entry. It is hard to see why both appear on the same list.

Who they are best for

Anyone methodically working through every free account, though most will likely skip the repeat.

Subscription value

Free with 94 photos and 4 videos, matching the earlier account exactly and adding little extra reason to subscribe.

My verdict: A redundant entry that lowers the ranking because it duplicates an earlier free profile. Rating: 8.1/10


19. Riley 🍼🀰🏻 Preggo AF – Distinct Niche Angle

Riley 🍼🀰🏻 Preggo AF OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Riley brings a clear pregnancy-focused theme that sets the account apart from the more general profiles around it.

  • Best for: Subscribers specifically interested in that theme
  • Main appeal: 140 photos and 5 videos with a focused direction
  • Content feel: Personal and topic-driven
  • Small drawback: The niche is narrow, so it will not appeal to everyone on the list

First impression

The page immediately signals its theme through the username and description. It feels more specialized than most surrounding free accounts.

Who they are best for

Viewers seeking a free account centered on pregnancy content rather than general Stamford material.

Subscription value

Free with a respectable photo count for a themed profile. The value depends almost entirely on whether the topic matches your interest.

My verdict: A useful mid-list option if the specific theme is what you are looking for, otherwise easy to pass. Rating: 8.4/10


20. Emily – Extremely Light Free Page

Emily OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Emily drops lower because the visible output is minimal even by the standards of the quieter free accounts.

  • Best for: Visitors finishing a complete review of every free listing
  • Main appeal: Free access with no expectations
  • Content feel: Almost empty
  • Small drawback: Only five photos and nothing else to explore

First impression

The page feels like it has barely begun. There is little to form an impression beyond the name.

Who they are best for

Readers who want to check every single free profile before deciding where to focus.

Subscription value

Free, yet the tiny number of posts means it offers almost no practical value until more content appears.

My verdict: A very early-stage account that ranks low simply due to how little is currently available. Rating: 8.0/10


21. Hazel πŸ˜‹ – Video-Heavy Free Account

Hazel πŸ˜‹ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Hazel stands out in this section because it is one of the few free pages with more videos than photos.

  • Best for: Viewers who prefer short videos over large photo sets
  • Main appeal: 16 videos in a mostly photo-light feed
  • Content feel: Casual and video-oriented
  • Small drawback: Only nine photos, so the visual variety stays limited

First impression

The profile feels video-first. It gives the sense of someone posting clips more often than still images.

Who they are best for

Subscribers who enjoy a free account where short videos make up the main activity.

Subscription value

Free with a video-to-photo ratio that is rare on this list. Worth a look if clips are your priority.

My verdict: A lower-ranked free option that earns a spot mainly through its unusual emphasis on video. Rating: 7.9/10


22. Chloe πŸ’š – Small but Clean Free Page

Chloe πŸ’š OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Chloe offers a modest free profile that is larger than the very smallest entries but still far from the busier free accounts.

  • Best for: Viewers who want a straightforward free option with a bit more than the bare minimum
  • Main appeal: 26 photos with no videos yet
  • Content feel: Simple and uncluttered
  • Small drawback: No video content and a modest photo total

First impression

The layout is neat and direct. There is enough to see a basic direction without any sense of a large archive.

Who they are best for

People scanning free profiles who prefer a clean page over one packed with material.

Subscription value

Free with 26 photos. It sits in the middle ground of the free tier, useful mainly as a quick browse.

My verdict: A middle-of-the-pack free account that adds nothing exceptional but stays easy to view. Rating: 7.8/10


23. Kiera πŸ§ƒπŸ§Έ – Stronger Free Performer

Kiera πŸ§ƒπŸ§Έ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Kiera climbs higher in this section because the like count and video total are noticeably stronger than most surrounding free accounts.

  • Best for: Free-account fans who want more activity and engagement signals
  • Main appeal: 66 photos and 49 videos with solid likes
  • Content feel: More active and video-rich than average
  • Small drawback: Still free, so production values remain casual rather than premium

First impression

The numbers here feel more substantial than most free pages in the lower half of the ranking. The video count in particular stands out.

Who they are best for

Subscribers who want a free profile with a decent mix of photos and videos and some visible audience response.

Subscription value

Free with 66 photos, 49 videos, and 55.5k likes. One of the stronger free options in the later part of the list.

My verdict: The best free account in this batch due to its video volume and engagement level. Rating: 7.9/10


24. KateπŸ’‹ – Least Developed Listing

KateπŸ’‹ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Kate ends the provided list with the smallest visible presence of any entry reviewed.

  • Best for: Viewers who insist on checking every single profile
  • Main appeal: Free with no barrier
  • Content feel: Barely started
  • Small drawback: Only three photos and nothing else to examine

First impression

The page looks like the earliest possible stage. There is almost nothing present beyond the basic profile information.

Who they are best for

Anyone determined to see the complete list before focusing on stronger entries.

Subscription value

Free, though the minimal content gives almost no reason to return or engage.

My verdict: The weakest entry on the list, included mainly for completeness. Rating: 7.0/10


26. Malika | Ω…Ψ§Ω„ΩƒΨ© πŸŒ™ – Quiet Mid-List Entry

Malika | Ω…Ψ§Ω„ΩƒΨ© πŸŒ™ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Malika appears here after the stronger free accounts because the visible activity is modest and the like count sits below several earlier pages.

  • Best for: Readers who want to finish reviewing every free profile
  • Main appeal: Simple free access with a small existing set of photos
  • Content feel: Low-key and early-stage
  • Small drawback: Only 35 photos and 2 videos limit any deeper evaluation

First impression

The page gives a basic, unadorned feel. Nothing stands out in presentation or volume, so it registers as one more free option rather than a destination.

Who they are best for

Anyone conducting a full pass through the free tier before returning to the more active accounts higher up.

Subscription value

Free with limited material. It offers little reason to linger once the stronger free profiles have already been seen.

My verdict: A functional but unremarkable free entry that fits near the lower middle of the ranking. Rating: 7.7/10


27. Kira Williams πŸ’‹ – Solid Free Engagement

Kira Williams πŸ’‹ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Kira Williams earns a slightly higher placement through a stronger like count than most of the surrounding free accounts, even with a modest post total.

  • Best for: Viewers who check engagement numbers before deciding where to browse
  • Main appeal: Noticeable likes on a compact set of photos
  • Content feel: Straightforward and photo-focused
  • Small drawback: No videos, so the profile stays limited to still images

First impression

The like total draws attention first. The page does not flood the visitor with material, yet the response it has received suggests it has connected with some viewers.

Who they are best for

Subscribers who like to sample free profiles that already show decent audience interest without requiring large archives.

Subscription value

Free with 79 photos and a respectable like count. Worth a brief look if engagement signals matter more than volume.

My verdict: A mid-tier free option that benefits from better audience response than several nearby entries. Rating: 7.6/10


28. 𝐏𝐨𝐒𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐯𝐲 πŸ–€πŸˆβ€β¬› – Repeated Darker Tone

𝐏𝐨𝐒𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐈𝐯𝐲 πŸ–€πŸˆβ€β¬› OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

This second appearance of Poison Ivy repeats the same numbers and mood already seen earlier, which lowers its position on the list.

  • Best for: Readers who want to confirm every duplicate entry
  • Main appeal: Same free profile already reviewed at position 16
  • Content feel: Identical to the earlier listing
  • Small drawback: Adds no new information or content

First impression

The page looks exactly like the earlier Poison Ivy entry. It is hard to justify reviewing it a second time.

Who they are best for

Anyone methodically checking the full list, though most will recognize the duplicate quickly.

Subscription value

Free with the same 199 photos and 4 videos already evaluated. No additional value is gained by returning.

My verdict: A clear duplicate that weakens the overall list and earns a lower ranking for that reason. Rating: 7.4/10


29. NikaπŸ„ – Already Covered Mid-Tier Free Account

NikaπŸ„ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

This Nika entry matches the same profile and stats reviewed at position 17, placing it lower due to repetition.

  • Best for: Thorough list-checkers only
  • Main appeal: Identical free page seen earlier
  • Content feel: No change from the previous listing
  • Small drawback: Offers nothing additional

First impression

The account is indistinguishable from the earlier Nika entry. The repetition is obvious on comparison.

Who they are best for

Visitors who prefer to scan every line even when duplicates appear.

Subscription value

Free with the same 92 photos and 4 videos already assessed. No new material is provided.

My verdict: Another repeated entry that does not improve the ranking and is best skipped. Rating: 7.3/10


30. BettyπŸ¦‹ – Third Appearance of the Same Profile

BettyπŸ¦‹ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Betty returns for a third time with the exact same limited stats already seen twice before.

  • Best for: Readers completing an exhaustive check of every entry
  • Main appeal: Same free page reviewed at positions 6 and 18
  • Content feel: No variation or added material
  • Small drawback: Completely redundant on the list

First impression

The page is identical to the earlier Betty listings. It contributes nothing new to the ranking.

Who they are best for

Only those who want to be absolutely certain every duplicate has been noted.

Subscription value

Free with the same 94 photos and 4 videos. The value remains unchanged from previous mentions.

My verdict: A repeated listing that further lowers the overall quality of the provided list. Rating: 7.2/10


31. Hazel πŸ˜‹ – Already Reviewed Video-Focused Free Page

Hazel πŸ˜‹ OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Hazel reappears with the same video-heavy numbers already covered at position 21.

  • Best for: List-completers who check every line
  • Main appeal: Duplicate of the earlier free video entry
  • Content feel: No new content or changes
  • Small drawback: Adds no fresh information

First impression

The profile matches the previous Hazel entry exactly. The repetition is clear.

Who they are best for

Anyone insisting on reviewing the list in its entirety despite duplicates.

Subscription value

Free with the same 9 photos and 16 videos. Subscription appeal stays the same as before.

My verdict: Another redundant entry that does not strengthen the overall ranking. Rating: 7.1/10


32. Chloe πŸ’š – Repeated Small Free Profile

Chloe πŸ’š OnlyFans creator in the Stamford niche

Chloe appears again with identical modest numbers already evaluated at position 22.

  • Best for: Readers finishing an exhaustive sweep
  • Main appeal: Same free page seen earlier
  • Content feel: No updates or additions
  • Small drawback: Provides no new reason to subscribe

First impression

The page is a direct repeat of the earlier Chloe listing. It feels unnecessary on the list.

Who they are best for

Only those checking every single entry for completeness.

Subscription value

Free with the same 26 photos. Value does not increase with the duplicate.

My verdict: A repeated entry that lowers the list’s usefulness and receives a correspondingly lower score. Rating: 7.0/10


End of Available List

The input data contains only 24 entries with several duplicates already covered through position 32. No creators numbered 36-43 exist in the provided list.